How do income approach methods work?
In very simplified terms, the income approach is about
- estimate future profits
- discounting these profits
- adding up the discounted profits
This gives the current value of the company according to the Income Approach. The discount rate takes into account the timing of the income in the future and the specific risk of the investment.
Different approaches to the income approach
There are different models within the Income Approach. These models differ in terms of the cash flows that are discounted. They also vary in terms of the discount rate used.
Simplified income method
Approach : This method assumes consistent, constant cash flows and is ideal for companies with a stable earnings situation.
What is discounted : A representative, normalized annual net profit.
How to discount : With a capitalization rate that reflects the company’s risk and the market’s expectations of return.
Example Income Appraisal Method
Earnings after interest and taxes (E) | 500.000 |
capitalization rate (i) | 10% |
The yield value W E is calculated as:
W E =
E
i
=
500,000
0.10
= 5,000,000
Where E is the profit after taxes and interest and i is the capitalization rate.
Advantages and disadvantages of this method
Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) method
Approach : The DCF approach predicts future cash flows, which may vary, making it suitable for companies whose earnings change over time.
What is being discounted : Estimated future cash flows over a specific forecast period.
How to discount Using the Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC), which reflects the average cost of capital employed.
Example Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) method
Free Cash Flow (FCF) for the next 3 years
forecast year 1 | forecast year 2 | forecast year 3 | |
---|---|---|---|
Free Cash Flow (FCF) | 300.000 | 330.000 | 360.000 |
Calculation of Discounted Cash Flows and Terminal Value
Discount rate (r) = 10%
Terminal growth rate (g) = 2%
DCF 1 =
FCF 1
(1 + r) 1
=
300,000
1.10
= 272,727
DCF 2 =
FCF 2
(1 + r) 2
=
330,000
(1.10)2
=
330,000
1.21
= 272,727
DCF 3 =
FCF 3
(1 + r) 3
=
360,000
(1.10)3
=
360,000
1.33
= 270,676
Calculation of the terminal value (TV)
The terminal value is calculated as:
TV =
FCF 3 Γ (1 + g)
r – g
=
360,000 Γ 1.02
0.10 – 0.02
= 4,590,000
The terminal value is then also discounted:
DCF TV =
4,590,000
(1 + r) 3
=
4,590,000
1.33
= 3,451,128
Total Business Value (EV)
EV = Total DCF + DCF TV = 272.727 + 272.727 + 270.676 + 3,451.128 = 4,267.258
Calculation of Equity Value
The equity value is calculated by subtracting net debt from the business value:
Equity value = EV – debt + cash
Suppose the company has 500,000 in debt and 200,000 in cash:
Equity value = 4,267,258 – 500,000 + 200,000 = 3,967,258
The equity value is therefore 3,967,258.
Advantages and disadvantages of this method
Residual value method
Approach : This method focuses on residual profit , which is profits less the cost of equity. It directly calculates the equity value by adding the current book value of equity and the discounted future residual earnings.
What is discounted : The cash flows for an explicit forecast period and additionally the residual value applied for the subsequent period.
How to discount : Here too, the WACC is often used to discount both the cash flows and the residual value to today’s value.
Example Residual Value Method
Example calculation: Company valuation using the residual value method
assumptions
- Discount rate (πβ): 8%
- Initial book value of equity (π΅β): β¬1,000,000
- Net result in the first year (ππΌβ): β¬150,000
- Forecast period: 3 years
- Growth rate (π): 2%
calculations
1. Projected net results and book values
Year 1 | year 2 | year 3 | |
---|---|---|---|
net result (ππΌ) | 150.000 β¬ | 153.000 β¬ | 156.060 β¬ |
book value of equity (π΅) | 1.150.000 β¬ | 1.303.000 β¬ | 1.459.060 β¬ |
2. Calculation of residual profits
Year 1 | year 2 | year 3 | |
---|---|---|---|
residual profit (π πΌ) | 70.000 β¬ | 61.000 β¬ | 51.820 β¬ |
3. Present value of residual profits
Year 1 | year 2 | year 3 | |
---|---|---|---|
present value factor | 1.08 | 1.1664 | 1.259712 |
present value of the residual profit | 64.815 β¬ | 52.293 β¬ | 41.145 β¬ |
4. Calculation of the terminal value
- Growing residual profit in year 4: π πΌβ = π πΌβ Γ (1 + π) = β¬51,820 Γ 1.02 = β¬52,856
- Terminal value at the end of year 3: TV = π πΌβ / (πβ – π) = 52,856 β¬ / (0.08 – 0.02) = 880,940 β¬
- Present value of the terminal value: PV(TV) = β¬880,940 / 1.259712 = β¬699,632
5. Total value of the company
- Sum of the present values of the residual profits: β¬64,815 + β¬52,293 + β¬41,145 = β¬158,253
- Total present value of residual profits including terminal value: β¬158,253 + β¬699,632 = β¬857,885
- Enterprise value (πβ): π΅β + total present value of residual profits = β¬1,000,000 + β¬857,885 = β¬1,857,885
Multi-period dividend discounting
Approach : This approach is suitable for companies whose dividends vary over time, especially for listed companies.
What is being discounted : Projected dividend payments, which may change over different periods.
How to discount : Using the cost of equity, usually calculated using the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) to reflect the risk of the stock.
Example : Dividends of 1.00, 1.20, 1.40 over three years and an expected constant dividend of 1.50 thereafter, with a cost of equity of 5%, result in a value per share of approximately 29.00.
Example Multi-Period Dividend Discounting
Example: Multi-year dividend discounting
Dividend forecast for the next 3 years
Year | Dividend (in β¬) |
---|---|
Year 1 | 1.00 |
year 2 | 1.20 |
year 3 | 1.40 |
From year 4 (constant dividend) | 1.50 |
Calculation of discounted dividends
Cost of equity (r) = 5% or 0.05
D 1 =
Dividend 1
(1 + r) 1
=
1,00
1.05
= 0,952 β¬
D 2 =
Dividend 2
(1 + r) 2
=
1,20
(1.05)2
=
1,20
1.1025
= 1,088 β¬
D 3 =
Dividend 3
(1 + r) 3
=
1,40
(1.05)3
=
1,40
1.157625
= 1,209 β¬
Calculation of the terminal value (from year 4)
The terminal value (TV) is calculated using the Gordon Growth formula:
TV =
Dividend 4
r
=
1,50
0.05
= 30,00 β¬
The terminal value must also be discounted:
Discounted terminal value =
TV
(1 + r) 3
=
30,00
1.157625
= 25,91 β¬
Total share value (sum of discounted dividends)
Stock value = D 1 + D 2 + D 3 + Discounted terminal value
Share value = 0.952 + 1.088 + 1.209 + 25.91 = β¬29.16
The calculated share value is therefore β¬29.16.
Advantages and disadvantages of this method
Income value methods compared to other methods
The income method focuses on future cash flow and is therefore future-oriented. It is particularly valuable when it comes to assessing the growth potential and sustainable profitability of a company.
In contrast to this is the intrinsic value method , which measures the value of a company based on its current assets minus liabilities. This method is often relevant when valuing asset-intensive companies or in liquidation scenarios.
The comparative value method , on the other hand, uses market data to determine the company’s value and draws comparisons to similar companies that have recently been sold. This method depends heavily on the availability and comparability of market data. (Here NIMBO offers a company valuation calculator , which is based on current market data for respective countries).
The real options method looks at a company from the perspective of future strategic options and is particularly applicable in industries with high uncertainty and rapid change.
Finally, the liquidation value approach estimates the amount that owners would receive in the event of a business dissolution. This approach is often used when companies are facing closure and has a strong focus on the present.
Each of these methods offers a different perspective on the value of a company and can be chosen depending on the specific context and objective of the valuation.
The Earned Income Methods in an International Context
The application of the income approach and its models is influenced by local valuation practices and regulatory frameworks. A look at the practices in different countries shows how diverse these approaches can be:
Europe
In Germany, the simplified income method is a preferred method that is particularly used in the valuation of medium-sized companies. This approach is supported by the standards of the Institute of Public Accountants. Similar valuation methodologies are used in Italy , Spain and Poland , with local GAAP and European Union guidelines influencing specific valuation practices. The DCF method is also widespread in these countries, especially among larger, internationally operating companies.
In Switzerland and the Netherlands , with their highly internationally oriented economies, the DCF approach, which is familiar to international investors and is in line with IFRS, often dominates. In Sweden and Norway there is also a strong preference for the DCF, due to the transparency of the Nordic markets and the dominance of IFRS.
The UK follows similar valuation standards to the US, with a strong bias towards the DCF approach. This is facilitated by a market-oriented perspective and the availability of detailed financial information.
North America
In the United States and Canada , DCF is the dominant method, supported by the preference for shareholder value and mature capital markets. US GAAP and Canadian GAAP provide a firm framework for cash flow forecasting and valuation.
Africa and Middle East
In South Africa , the income approach is also used, although the specific choice of model depends on the size and sector of the company. Due to the economic dynamism and volatility in some African markets, the simplified income approach may be appropriate to mitigate valuation risk here.
In the United Arab Emirates , where the real estate market plays a major role, the simplified income method is particularly common in real estate valuation, while in the corporate sector the DCF is preferred to appeal to international investors.
Oceania
In Australia , with a developed capital market and a strong focus on international investors, the DCF is the dominant method, supported by the application of IFRS.
In summary, in developed markets with strong international exposure and easily accessible financial information, DCF is the dominant method. In markets that are characterized by a stronger focus on medium-sized businesses and local investments, the simplified income method is used more frequently. The specific models used in each country reflect the needs of local and international investors and depend on the respective regulatory and market conditions.
Overview of the most important methods for company valuation